H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Linda Wild H2H: 1-2

Linda Wild holds a 2–1 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 2–0 on carpet, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1996 Oakland round of 32 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Linda Wild
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Wild #33 6-2 7-6 Chanda Rubin #13 Match data Nov 7, 1996* R32 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Chanda Rubin #28 6-4 6-1 Linda Wild #46 Match data May 20, 1994* R16 Lucerne Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Linda Wild #41 6-1 7-5 Chanda Rubin #66 Match data Nov 5, 1993* R16 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Linda Wild #252 #23 823 1,815 135 146 48.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Chanda Rubin Linda Wild
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1989 1–7 12.5% #155 1,457 0 0
1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 1990 9–12 42.9% #86 1,554 0 0
1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1991 20–19 51.3% #41 1,720 0 0
1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1992 19–21 47.5% #49 1,732 0 0
1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1993 24–18 57.1% #45 1,764 0 2
1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1994 20–19 51.3% #49 1,740 0 2
1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1995 17–13 56.7% #58 1,758 0 4
1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1996 22–16 57.9% #29 1,809 0 5
1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1997 3–14 17.6% #223 1,625 0 5
2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1999 0–3 0.0% #191 1,566 0 5
2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 2000 0–3 0.0% #252 1,540 0 5
2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 — — — — — — —
2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 — — — — — — —
2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 — — — — — — —
2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Chanda Rubin Linda Wild
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 8 9 17 47.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1992 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 15 9 24 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8%
1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1996 15 10 25 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% Career 70 79 149 47.0% 19 30 49 38.8% 19 19 38 50.0% 27 18 45 60.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Chanda Rubin Linda Wild
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 1972 1493 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.85 1989 1457 103.4 — — — — +30 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 — — -0.09
1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.28 1990 1555 123.6 — — — — +1 -3 — 43.2% -0.52 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.32
1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1991 1721 134.6 — — — — -71 -49 -115 50.0% -0.26 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.67
1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) — -1.24 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -89 -75 +45 47.8% -0.05 6–6 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -1.52
1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.03 1993 1765 132.8 — — — — +27 -174 -41 56.4% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.50
1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.38 1994 1741 132.8 — — — — -38 -164 +80 51.6% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.90
1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) — -2.41 1995 1758 128.9 — — — — +19 -201 +14 58.0% +0.57 3–6 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.45
1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.79 1996 1810 144.4 — — — — +25 -227 -22 55.2% +0.55 7–6 (54%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.67
1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) — -2.46 1997 1625 106.2 — — — — +96 -90 +72 25.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.19
2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) — -2.47 1999 1567 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.38
2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.54 2000 1541 109.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.42
2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 Career 1816 137.3 — — — — -7 -98 +18 48.5% -0.14 43–42 (51%) 31–29 (52%) 102.2 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.