H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1998 Roland Garros first round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Chanda Rubin #70 3-6 6-3 6-4 Lori Mcneil #123 Match data
Jan 11, 1996* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #15 6-2 6-2 Lori Mcneil #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11