H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chanda Rubin vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 0-2
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Eastbourne second round 0-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1994* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 0-6 7-5 7-5 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1993* | Sapporo | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 6-0 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,047 | 343 | 231 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chanda Rubin | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,989 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |