H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 0-2

Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Eastbourne Open round of 64 0-6 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 0-6 7-5 7-5 Chanda Rubin #31 Match data Jun 15, 1994* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 6-2 6-0 Chanda Rubin #63 Match data Oct 1, 1993* R32 Sapporo Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,850 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Chanda Rubin Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,541 0 1
1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,586 0 1
1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,592 0 1
1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,745 0 1
1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,739 0 1
1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,773 0 1
2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,787 0 1
2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,665 0 1
2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,673 0 1
2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 — — — — — — —
2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Chanda Rubin Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 9 16 25 36.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 11 14 25 44.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1990 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1993 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 3 10 13 23.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% Career 125 129 254 49.2% 7 20 27 25.9% 11 20 31 35.5% 33 33 66 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Chanda Rubin Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 1983 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.02
1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 1984 1478 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.29
1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 1985 1542 112.3 — — — — +15 — — 63.2% +0.89 1–0 0–1 — +0.37
1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1986 1683 123.1 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.34 8–2 (80%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.30
1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1987 1659 129.2 — — — — +44 — -85 41.9% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.83
1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1988 1587 119.6 — — — — +2 — -37 37.3% -1.03 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -1.05
1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1989 1592 119.9 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.25 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +2.41
1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1990 1746 136.3 — — — — +8 -257 — 51.7% +0.10 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 103.1 -0.70
1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 1991 1740 132.5 — — — — +15 -243 -169 48.9% -0.13 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 103.3 +0.98
1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 1992 1697 133.3 — — — — +32 — -146 48.5% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.1 +0.32
2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 1993 1749 139.9 — — — — +28 -270 -150 51.6% +0.31 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 -0.37
2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 1994 1773 143.7 — — — — +15 -260 -181 48.5% -0.08 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.29
2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 1995 1788 149.0 — — — — +45 -292 — 54.1% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +0.06
2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 1996 1666 124.9 — — — — +54 -192 — 31.6% -1.28 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.43
2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 1997 1673 119.1 — — — — +35 — — 52.6% +0.37 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07
2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 Career 1850 139.7 — — — — +22 -251 -124 47.3% -0.20 63–57 (53%) 39–25 (61%) 108.6 +0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.