H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Marlene Weingartner H2H: 4-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 4–1 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 Luxembourg semifinal 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 25, 2003* Luxembourg WTA 250 SF Hard Chanda Rubin #10 6-2 7-5 Marlene Weingartner #62 Match data
Jul 26, 2001* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #26 6-2 6-4 Marlene Weingartner #41 Match data
May 22, 1999* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Chanda Rubin #23 6-1 6-4 Marlene Weingartner #77 Match data
Mar 21, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Marlene Weingartner #106 2-6 7-5 6-4 Chanda Rubin #24 Match data
Jan 20, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Chanda Rubin #30 6-1 6-2 Marlene Weingartner #106 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,677 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Marlene Weingartner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,511 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,533 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,494 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,483 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,664 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,628 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,507 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —