H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Martina Hingis H2H: 2-8

Martina Hingis holds a 8–2 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 5–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2000 Los Angeles fourth round 5-7 7-5 6-1.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 8
10 main draw meetings
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 2000* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #1 5-7 7-5 6-1 Chanda Rubin #19 Match data
Jun 8, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-3 Chanda Rubin #25 Match data
Mar 3, 2000* Scottsdale WTA 500 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-3 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data
Feb 5, 2000* Tokyo WTA 1000 SF Carpet Martina Hingis #1 7-6(2) 6-4 Chanda Rubin #25 Match data
Nov 12, 1999* Philadelphia WTA 250 R16 Carpet Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-0 Chanda Rubin #24 Match data
Aug 20, 1999* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-1 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data
Aug 6, 1999* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #2 7-5 6-3 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data
Mar 10, 1999* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Chanda Rubin #26 6-3 7-6 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Mar 21, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-0 Chanda Rubin #50 Match data
Oct 6, 1995* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #15 6-2 6-1 Martina Hingis #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,385 515 126 80.3% 5 18 2 10 8 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,826 0 0
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1996 45–15 75.0% #6 2,160 0 2
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,321 3 14
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,285 5 26
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,314 5 35
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,123 5 38
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,050 5 40
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% 2,020 5 40
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,013 5 42
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,855 5 43
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7