H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-2

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 2–1 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1999 Auckland third round 7-6 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 7, 1999* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #35 7-6 3-6 6-2 Mary Joe Fernandez #77 Match data
Jul 30, 1998* Stanford WTA 250 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #49 6-4 6-4 Chanda Rubin #48 Match data
Nov 13, 1995 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #8 3-6 6-2 6-3 Chanda Rubin #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —