H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Maureen Drake H2H: 2-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2000 Amelia Island round of 64 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #25 7-5 6-3 Maureen Drake #78 Match data Apr 12, 2000* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Chanda Rubin #29 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Maureen Drake #77 Match data Mar 15, 2000* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.