H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-5

Monica Seles holds a 5–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2003 Tokyo semifinal 4-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 1, 2003* Tokyo WTA 1000 SF Carpet Monica Seles #9 4-6 6-4 6-2 Chanda Rubin #12 Match data
May 26, 2002* Madrid WTA 1000 F Clay Monica Seles #6 6-4 6-2 Chanda Rubin #65 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Monica Seles #6 6-3 4-6 6-4 Chanda Rubin #18 Match data
Jun 2, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Monica Seles #8 6-1 6-4 Chanda Rubin #70 Match data
Jan 28, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-7(2) 6-1 7-5 Chanda Rubin #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —