H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 4-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 4–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2000 Roland Garros fourth round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 6, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Chanda Rubin #25 6-4 7-5 Natasha Zvereva #40 Match data
Jan 24, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #30 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #17 Match data
Oct 14, 1995* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Hard Chanda Rubin #15 7-5 7-5 Natasha Zvereva #14 Match data
Feb 13, 1994* Chicago WTA 250 F Carpet Natasha Zvereva #19 6-3 7-5 Chanda Rubin #47 Match data
Mar 4, 1992* Boca Raton WTA 1000 R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #94 1-6 6-4 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5