H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 3-2

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–2 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2001 Linz fourth round 3-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 26, 2001* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #41 3-6 7-5 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #11 Match data
Jun 4, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Chanda Rubin #25 6-4 7-6(3) Nathalie Tauziat #6 Match data
Aug 13, 1998* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #11 6-4 7-5 Chanda Rubin #45 Match data
Mar 25, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #9 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #20 Match data
Jun 25, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 F Grass Nathalie Tauziat #31 3-6 6-0 7-5 Chanda Rubin #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8