H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 2-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1996 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #9 6-2 6-0 Nicole Bradtke #43 Match data Mar 14, 1996* R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Chanda Rubin #75 7-6(1) 6-3 Nicole Bradtke #42 Match data Sep 3, 1992* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,866 182 164 52.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,599 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,739 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1992 22–18 55.0% #47 1,710 0 1
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,756 0 2
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,704 0 2
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,785 0 3
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 1996 6–11 35.3% #94 1,708 0 3
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,696 0 3
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Nicole Bradtke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1986 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1991 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1992 13 8 21 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1995 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 106 83 189 56.1% 48 44 92 52.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Nicole Bradtke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 1985 1508 116.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.25
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 1986 1548 101.9 — — — — +44 -8 — 53.8% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +2.05
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1987 1599 120.5 — — — — +20 -1 -62 44.3% -0.33 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +1.69
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1988 1739 135.8 — — — — -93 +65 -219 57.3% +0.23 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 -0.02
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1989 1711 134.8 — — — — -34 +69 -153 48.7% -0.16 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +0.32
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1990 1758 145.1 — — — — -31 +44 -163 52.6% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 -2.63
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1991 1760 142.2 — — — — +22 -3 -161 50.5% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 98.9 -2.07
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 1992 1710 137.2 — — — — +42 -8 -96 57.0% +0.69 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 92.0 +0.67
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 1993 1756 140.3 — — — — +73 -52 -113 62.8% +1.01 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 +0.27
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 1994 1705 114.0 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 1995 1786 146.5 — — — — -12 -47 -117 57.1% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 -2.62
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 1996 1709 125.5 — — — — +33 -3 — 43.2% -0.81 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 94.7 -0.45
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 1997 1696 110.1 — — — — +26 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — -0.02
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1866 143.1 — — — — +7 +12 -133 52.8% +0.22 52–57 (48%) 38–42 (48%) 97.9 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.