H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chanda Rubin vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-1
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2006 US Open first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-4 6-3 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,047 | 343 | 231 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chanda Rubin | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,989 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |