H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 1-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 1–0 lead over Nuria Llagostera Vives in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2001 Oporto round of 32 4-6 7-6(8) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nuria Llagostera Vives
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 156 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #18 4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 Nuria Llagostera Vives #95 Match data Apr 5, 2001* R32 Oporto Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Nuria Llagostera Vives #775 #35 968 1,685 78 111 41.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Nuria Llagostera Vives
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #128 1,509 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 2001 8–12 40.0% #103 1,500 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 2002 1–8 11.1% #192 1,442 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 2003 1–2 33.3% #140 1,450 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 2004 4–6 40.0% #76 1,485 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 2005 20–19 51.3% #50 1,617 0 1
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 2006 6–5 54.5% #275 1,624 0 1
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2007 5–10 33.3% #145 1,557 0 1
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 2008 14–11 56.0% #68 1,626 0 2
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 2009 8–16 33.3% #146 1,562 0 2
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 2010 4–7 36.4% #127 1,566 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2011 3–9 25.0% #131 1,550 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2006 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 4 4 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 28 48 76 36.8% 49 56 105 46.7% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 22/100 of Chanda Rubin's and 77/147 of Nuria Llagostera Vives's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Chanda Rubin Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/10 2.0 6.0 50.8% 66.7% 31.3% 54.5% 27.3% 49.2% 40.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/39 1.6 5.8 52.8% 62.1% 45.5% 54.2% 37.3% 54.3% 44.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/11 1.0 2.5 47.8% 52.5% 40.4% 12.5% 28.6% 46.5% 39.3%
27 2003 9/63 2.6 3.1 60.3% 59.5% 50.1% 50.9% 48.1% 56.0% 48.6% 2007 9/15 0.3 3.4 55.8% 58.6% 43.0% 61.5% 50.2% 51.6% 45.8%
28 2004 7/29 1.0 2.9 63.3% 64.2% 47.5% 49.3% 53.5% 58.1% 48.4% 2008 17/25 1.4 4.6 53.5% 62.2% 47.0% 49.9% 51.9% 55.0% 45.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 21/24 1.2 5.7 50.7% 63.1% 40.0% 53.6% 47.6% 51.6% 43.8%
30 2006 6/8 0.2 1.2 69.5% 55.1% 44.9% 36.1% 40.3% 51.5% 33.4% 2010 10/11 0.7 4.3 54.1% 62.1% 42.3% 53.8% 48.4% 53.4% 39.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 12/12 1.3 5.8 49.8% 61.0% 42.0% 46.3% 40.8% 51.5% 44.2%
Career — 22/577 1.4 2.5 63.8% 59.8% 47.9% 46.4% 47.7% 55.4% 44.4% — 77/189 1.1 4.9 52.3% 61.6% 42.8% 51.6% 46.5% 52.6% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 2000 1510 109.4 — — — — — +32 — 45.8% -0.33 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.01
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 2001 1500 109.9 — — — — +59 +14 — 45.8% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 +0.82
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 2002 1443 104.5 — — — — +95 -4 — 27.3% -1.77 0–4 (0%) — — -0.25
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 2003 1450 110.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 0–2 — — -0.05
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 2004 1486 108.9 -1.40 -1.05 0.800 45.0% +38 -8 — 44.0% -0.08 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 98.0 -0.15
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 2005 1618 123.7 -0.47 +0.31 0.967 49.5% -57 +62 — 49.4% -0.33 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 105.4 +0.18
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 2006 1625 118.7 -2.02 -1.39 0.733 42.6% -39 — — 58.3% +0.29 2–2 (50%) — — -0.05
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 2007 1557 102.8 -2.20 +0.35 0.946 48.8% -23 +78 — 31.0% -1.21 0–1 1–1 — -0.03
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 2008 1627 122.9 0.00 +0.20 1.006 50.2% -58 +58 — 55.4% +0.36 3–5 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 -0.25
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 2009 1563 117.9 -2.95 +0.09 0.904 47.7% +2 +47 — 41.8% -0.65 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 98.4 -0.33
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 2010 1567 113.6 -0.81 -2.10 0.844 47.0% -9 +56 — 36.0% -0.80 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1551 125.4 -0.89 +0.18 0.911 48.0% -20 +59 — 32.1% -0.79 1–3 (25%) — — -1.00
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1685 122.8 -1.41 -0.16 0.921 48.3% -20 +45 — 44.5% -0.46 22–41 (35%) 21–15 (58%) 97.7 -0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.