H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 4-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 4–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1997 Quebec City fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
Age 60 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 24, 1997* Quebec City WTA 250 R16 Carpet Chanda Rubin #32 6-3 6-4 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
May 14, 1997* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Chanda Rubin #27 7-5 6-2 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Jun 30, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Chanda Rubin #21 7-6 6-7 17-15 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Nov 5, 1994* Quebec City WTA 250 QF Carpet Chanda Rubin #29 6-4 7-6 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,907 140 163 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,530 0 1
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,500 0 1
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,565 0 1
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,702 0 1
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1992 21–15 58.3% — 1,878 0 1
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,852 0 1
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 1996 9–15 37.5% — 1,678 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,660 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,571 0 1