H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 1-2

Sabine Appelmans holds a 2–1 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2000 Linz fourth round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 18, 2000* Linz WTA 500 R16 Carpet Chanda Rubin #15 7-5 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #45 Match data
Jan 20, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Sabine Appelmans #31 6-1 3-6 6-3 Chanda Rubin #22 Match data
Nov 3, 1991* Scottsdale WTA 250 F Hard Sabine Appelmans #23 7-5 6-1 Chanda Rubin #138 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —