H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 1-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1999 Hobart International round of 16 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Samantha Reeves
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #31 6-1 6-1 Samantha Reeves #118 Match data Jan 15, 1999* R16 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Samantha Reeves #864 #62 523 1,629 30 59 33.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Samantha Reeves
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1998 2–8 20.0% #111 1,480 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1999 4–8 33.3% #121 1,480 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 2000 1–4 20.0% #171 1,446 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 2001 4–3 57.1% #106 1,515 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 2002 8–14 36.4% #108 1,544 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 2003 8–10 44.4% #74 1,588 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 2004 3–12 20.0% #198 1,526 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Samantha Reeves
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 14 27 41 34.1% 11 22 33 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Samantha Reeves
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1998 1480 114.3 — — — — +27 +68 — 29.2% -1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.17
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1999 1481 106.1 — — — — +28 +49 — 34.6% -1.65 1–1 1–0 — +0.52
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 2000 1447 92.1 — — — — — +34 — 18.2% -1.45 1–0 0–1 — +0.50
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 2001 1515 113.3 — — — — +30 — — 47.1% +0.12 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.29
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 2002 1545 121.7 — — — — +16 -68 — 42.6% -0.48 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -0.91
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 2003 1589 112.2 -1.00 +0.72 0.861 46.5% -29 -69 +14 41.0% -0.92 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.54
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 2004 1526 110.0 -3.84 -1.12 0.609 38.9% -9 -32 — 24.2% -1.70 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.74
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1630 116.7 -2.07 +0.03 0.755 43.6% +12 -24 +14 35.8% -0.99 15–15 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 103.4 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.