H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-1

Chanda Rubin and Sandra Cecchini are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1994 Amelia Island second round 7-6 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 6, 1994* Amelia Island WTA 250 R64 Clay Chanda Rubin #31 7-6 1-6 6-3 Sandra Cecchini #57 Match data
Apr 8, 1992* Amelia Island WTA 250 R64 Clay Sandra Cecchini #30 6-2 6-1 Chanda Rubin #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11