H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 3-6

Sandrine Testud holds a 6–3 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2000 Montreal fourth round 6-4 6-1.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 6
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2000* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Sandrine Testud #11 6-4 6-1 Chanda Rubin #17 Match data
Aug 3, 2000* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Sandrine Testud #11 3-6 7-5 6-2 Chanda Rubin #19 Match data
Mar 13, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #29 6-4 2-6 6-2 Sandrine Testud #13 Match data
Oct 7, 1999* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Sandrine Testud #13 6-3 6-2 Chanda Rubin #24 Match data
May 23, 1998* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Sandrine Testud #14 6-4 6-3 Chanda Rubin #78 Match data
Aug 22, 1997* Atlanta WTA 250 R16 Hard Sandrine Testud #18 6-4 6-1 Chanda Rubin #34 Match data
Aug 7, 1997* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Sandrine Testud #19 6-4 6-2 Chanda Rubin #33 Match data
Feb 14, 1997* Linz WTA 500 R16 Carpet Chanda Rubin #22 6-4 6-3 Sandrine Testud #39 Match data
Jan 17, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #20 6-2 6-1 Sandrine Testud #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,019 309 236 56.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,546 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,566 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,560 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,771 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,938 0 1
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,946 0 2
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,916 0 2
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,976 0 3
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,845 0 3
32 2004 1–7 12.5% #313 1,739 0 3