H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 1-1

Chanda Rubin and Silvija Talaja are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on clay, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2000 Zurich third round 2-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2000* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #14 2-6 6-1 6-2 Silvija Talaja #22 Match data
May 27, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Silvija Talaja #69 2-6 6-1 6-4 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 130 151 46.3% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,588 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,555 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,603 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,700 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 2000 24–27 47.1% #29 1,647 0 2
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,543 0 2
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,559 0 2
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,543 0 2
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —