H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–1 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on grass, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 Eastbourne fourth round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2003* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Chanda Rubin #7 6-0 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #33 Match data
Jun 20, 2002* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Chanda Rubin #37 6-1 1-6 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #21 Match data
Aug 27, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #41 6-4 6-0 Chanda Rubin #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4