H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–1 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on grass, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 Eastbourne Open round of 16 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #7 6-0 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #33 Match data Jun 20, 2003* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Chanda Rubin #37 6-1 1-6 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #21 Match data Jun 20, 2002* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Tamarine Tanasugarn #41 6-4 6-0 Chanda Rubin #32 Match data Aug 27, 1997* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 22/100 of Chanda Rubin's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Chanda Rubin Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 2003 9/63 2.6 3.1 60.3% 59.5% 50.1% 50.9% 48.1% 56.0% 48.6% 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 2004 7/29 1.0 2.9 63.3% 64.2% 47.5% 49.3% 53.5% 58.1% 48.4% 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 2006 6/8 0.2 1.2 69.5% 55.1% 44.9% 36.1% 40.3% 51.5% 33.4% 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career — 22/577 1.4 2.5 63.8% 59.8% 47.9% 46.4% 47.7% 55.4% 44.4% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.