H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 7-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 7–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2002 Montreal second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 2002* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #15 6-1 6-3 Tatiana Panova #23 Match data
Jun 30, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Chanda Rubin #27 6-4 6-1 Tatiana Panova #23 Match data
Aug 1, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #26 6-0 6-3 Tatiana Panova #36 Match data
Aug 17, 2000* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #17 6-2 6-3 Tatiana Panova #40 Match data
Jun 23, 2000* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Chanda Rubin #20 6-1 7-5 Tatiana Panova #37 Match data
Feb 3, 2000* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Chanda Rubin #25 6-0 (ret.) Tatiana Panova #44 Match data
May 28, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Chanda Rubin #70 6-1 6-1 Tatiana Panova #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —