H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 7-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 7–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2002 Canadian Open round of 64 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #15 6-1 6-3 Tatiana Panova #23 Match data Aug 14, 2002* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Chanda Rubin #27 6-4 6-1 Tatiana Panova #23 Match data Jun 30, 2002* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chanda Rubin #26 6-0 6-3 Tatiana Panova #36 Match data Aug 1, 2001* R64 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Chanda Rubin #17 6-2 6-3 Tatiana Panova #40 Match data Aug 17, 2000* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Chanda Rubin #20 6-1 7-5 Tatiana Panova #37 Match data Jun 23, 2000* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Chanda Rubin #25 6-0 (ret.) Tatiana Panova #44 Match data Feb 3, 2000* R32 Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Chanda Rubin #70 6-1 6-1 Tatiana Panova #89 Match data May 28, 1998* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Tatiana Panova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 22/100 of Chanda Rubin's and 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Chanda Rubin Tatiana Panova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 2003 9/63 2.6 3.1 60.3% 59.5% 50.1% 50.9% 48.1% 56.0% 48.6% 2004 3/22 1.0 5.3 60.8% 51.6% 46.8% 48.3% 33.3% 49.8% 32.3%
28 2004 7/29 1.0 2.9 63.3% 64.2% 47.5% 49.3% 53.5% 58.1% 48.4% 2005 6/23 0.8 4.2 65.9% 55.3% 39.8% 45.9% 40.0% 50.4% 42.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/4 0.3 10.0 53.2% 50.6% 34.2% 49.0% 47.2% 43.0% 35.7%
30 2006 6/8 0.2 1.2 69.5% 55.1% 44.9% 36.1% 40.3% 51.5% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22/577 1.4 2.5 63.8% 59.8% 47.9% 46.4% 47.7% 55.4% 44.4% — 12/326 0.8 5.9 61.4% 53.2% 40.2% 47.3% 40.1% 48.4% 38.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Tatiana Panova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1994 1508 105.4 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) — -1.24 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.03 1996 1498 103.8 — — — — +10 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.38 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.03
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) — -2.41 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.59
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.79 1999 1584 124.6 — — — — -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.99
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) — -2.46 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.59
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) — -2.47 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) — +2.56
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.54 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.43
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -3.02 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.47
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.62 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.34
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.02 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.57
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.