H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Terri Oreilly holds a 1–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Terri Oreilly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Terri Oreilly won the 1991 Westchester round of 32 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terri Oreilly | 6-2 6-0 | Chanda Rubin | Match data | Jul 25, 1991* | R32 | Westchester | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,042 | 345 | 232 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Terri Oreilly | — | — | — | 1,518 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chanda Rubin | Terri Oreilly | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,934 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #52 | 1,858 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,820 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,718 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Chanda Rubin | Terri Oreilly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 27 | 15 | 42 | 64.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 201 | 135 | 336 | 59.8% | 66 | 47 | 113 | 58.4% | 36 | 23 | 59 | 61.0% | 42 | 27 | 69 | 60.9% | Career | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Chanda Rubin | Terri Oreilly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1990 | 1489 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 | 1991 | 1509 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 1991 | 1584 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 56.3% | +0.37 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.4 | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1617 | 121.6 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -100 | — | 40.7% | -0.90 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.5 | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1653 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -47 | +2 | 46.6% | -0.53 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–1 | — | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1804 | 148.9 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -107 | — | 58.4% | +0.56 | 10–5 (67%) | 8–2 (80%) | 111.5 | -1.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1934 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -151 | -210 | 64.6% | +1.22 | 10–10 (50%) | 10–8 (56%) | 103.9 | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1986 | 164.3 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 60.9% | +0.84 | 9–1 (90%) | 2–3 (40%) | 106.7 | -1.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1814 | 153.7 | — | — | — | — | +40 | +33 | — | 53.2% | +0.21 | 6–4 (60%) | 8–4 (67%) | 104.2 | -2.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1800 | 144.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +15 | -63 | 49.4% | +0.27 | 7–4 (64%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.7 | -0.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 1839 | 156.4 | — | — | — | — | +47 | -68 | — | 62.2% | +0.81 | 5–10 (33%) | 8–3 (73%) | 98.5 | -2.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1941 | 157.5 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -111 | -226 | 61.4% | +0.66 | 14–9 (61%) | 3–5 (38%) | 100.4 | -2.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1816 | 133.7 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -63 | -24 | 52.2% | +0.17 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.0 | -0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1962 | 162.2 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -101 | +11 | 68.5% | +1.48 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–1 (80%) | 109.0 | -3.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1918 | 157.5 | +1.04 | +3.08 | 1.104 | 51.9% | -9 | +11 | +142 | 62.9% | +0.85 | 13–6 (68%) | 4–3 (57%) | 104.3 | -0.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1858 | 136.0 | +2.06 | +2.08 | 1.157 | 53.1% | +22 | — | — | 58.7% | +0.65 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–6 (40%) | 96.4 | +0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1821 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | — | — | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1719 | 114.3 | -0.94 | -3.06 | 0.688 | 42.2% | +24 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.75 | — | — | — | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2043 | 157.5 | +0.82 | +1.09 | 0.996 | 49.6% | +13 | -69 | -49 | 57.4% | +0.52 | 103–69 (60%) | 62–47 (57%) | 110.6 | -2.61 | Career | 1518 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | — | — | +6.50 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 3 | 9 | 12 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Venus Williams | 2 | 9 | 11 | Sep 5, 2004 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 3 | 8 | 11 | Jun 22, 2003 | H2H |
| Jennifer Capriati | 5 | 6 | 11 | Jun 21, 2003 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 8 | 10 | Feb 8, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrie Cunningham | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Chanda Rubin | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |