H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chanda Rubin vs Yoon Jeong Cho H2H: 1-0
Chanda Rubin holds a 1–0 lead over Yoon Jeong Cho in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2002 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Chanda Rubin | 6-3 6-0 | Yoon Jeong Cho | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,047 | 343 | 231 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| Yoon Jeong Cho | #1,416 | #45 | 740 | 1,704 | 45 | 58 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chanda Rubin | Yoon Jeong Cho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,989 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1416 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |