H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-1

Zina Garrison holds a 1–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1993 Birmingham semifinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 12, 1993* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Zina Garrison #25 6-1 6-2 Chanda Rubin #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15