H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chanelle Scheepers vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-2

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 2–0 lead over Chanelle Scheepers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2013 Miami first round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanelle Scheepers
RSA Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 19, 2013* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-0 Chanelle Scheepers #61 Match data
Jan 31, 2013* Pattaya WTA 250 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 7-5 6-1 Chanelle Scheepers #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanelle Scheepers #429 #37 1,505 1,725 87 108 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanelle Scheepers Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2003 1–1 50.0% #299 1,503 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2008 0–2 0.0% #187 1,485 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2009 4–8 33.3% #127 1,484 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2010 7–9 43.8% #103 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2011 20–19 51.3% #38 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2012 24–26 48.0% #60 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2013 15–21 41.7% #80 1,572 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2014 15–17 46.9% #77 1,620 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2015 1–5 16.7% #424 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8