H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Ching Ling Chang vs Helle Sparre H2H: 0-1

Helle Sparre holds a 1–0 lead over Ching Ling Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helle Sparre leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helle Sparre won the 1974 Sebring round of 64 6-4 1-6 6-1.

H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helle Sparre 6-4 1-6 6-1 Ching Ling Chang Match data Mar 6, 1974* R64 Sebring WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ching Ling Chang — — — 1,500 13 41 24.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Helle Sparre — — — 1,532 22 41 34.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ching Ling Chang Helle Sparre
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1974 9–15 37.5% — 1,448 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1975 1–3 25.0% — 1,445 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,444 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1977 5–6 45.5% — 1,494 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1978 6–14 30.0% — 1,476 0 0
23 1971 0–5 0.0% — 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1972 0–3 0.0% — 1,442 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1973 5–11 31.2% — 1,445 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1974 8–16 33.3% — 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1975 0–6 0.0% — 1,411 0 0 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ching Ling Chang Helle Sparre
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1496 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1449 100.7 — — — — +100 +104 +30 38.6% -0.72 5–4 (56%) 0–4 (0%) 98.7 +2.70
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1446 101.3 — — — — — +120 — 22.2% -2.44 1–0 1–0 — +0.22
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1445 96.4 — — — — +99 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.53
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1495 112.6 — — — — — +86 — 48.0% +0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +1.01
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1476 102.9 — — — — +49 +63 -14 35.6% -1.00 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.21
23 1971 1468 98.2 — — — — — — +43 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1972 1442 90.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1973 1445 99.8 — — — — — +24 +44 34.3% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1974 1467 93.7 — — — — +96 -3 — 35.8% -1.49 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1975 1412 92.1 — — — — — — — 7.7% -3.31 0–1 1–0 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1500 93.3 — — — — +96 +8 +44 28.3% -1.86 3–6 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 101.2 +4.48 — 1532 104.7 — — — — +84 +90 +4 37.5% -0.83 10–10 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 96.2 +8.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.