H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Chris Evert vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 16-5

Chris Evert holds a 16–5 lead over Andrea Jaeger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 21 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 7–0 on hard courts and 4–2 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1984 Johannesburg final 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
16 – 5
21 main draw meetings
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 1984* Johannesburg WTA 250 F Hard Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-0 Andrea Jaeger #8 Match data
Nov 26, 1983* Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 SF Carpet Chris Evert 6-1 7-5 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Jun 4, 1983* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Feb 5, 1983* Palm Beach WTA 250 F Clay Chris Evert 6-3 6-3 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Dec 12, 1982* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Grass Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Nov 21, 1982* Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 F Carpet Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Oct 17, 1982* Tampa WTA 250 F Hard Chris Evert 3-6 6-1 6-4 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Oct 10, 1982* Deerfield Beach WTA 250 F Hard Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Sep 12, 1982* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Chris Evert 6-1 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Jun 5, 1982* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-1 Chris Evert Match data
Apr 25, 1982* Amelia Island WTA 250 F Clay Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Apr 10, 1982* Hilton Head WTA 250 SF Clay Andrea Jaeger 6-1 1-6 6-2 Chris Evert Match data
Feb 28, 1982* Oakland WTA 250 F Carpet Andrea Jaeger 7-6 6-4 Chris Evert Match data
Oct 18, 1981* Deerfield Beach WTA 250 F Hard Chris Evert 4-6 6-3 6-0 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Aug 17, 1981 Toronto WTA 250 SF Hard Chris Evert 4-6 6-1 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Jan 12, 1981* Landover WTA 250 QF Carpet Andrea Jaeger (w/o) Chris Evert Match data
Oct 19, 1980* Deerfield Beach WTA 250 F Hard Chris Evert 6-4 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Aug 10, 1980* Indianapolis WTA 250 F Clay Chris Evert 6-4 6-3 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Jul 4, 1980* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Jun 13, 1980* Chichester WTA 250 QF Grass Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data
Jan 28, 1980 Seattle WTA 250 BR Carpet Andrea Jaeger (w/o) Chris Evert Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,280 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 1980 62–18 77.5% — 2,169 0 4
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1981 61–18 77.2% — 2,179 0 7
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1982 65–20 76.5% — 2,170 0 9
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1983 50–18 73.5% — 2,091 0 10
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,015 0 10
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,932 0 10
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,907 0 10
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,882 0 10
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 — — — — — — —
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 — — — — — — —
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 — — — — — — —
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 — — — — — — —
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —