H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 16-5 (incl. walkovers)

Chris Evert vs Andrea Jaeger: 16–3 excluding walkovers; 16–5 including 2 walkovers. Across 21 main-draw results including walkovers, Chris Evert leads 7–0 on hard courts and 4–2 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1984 South African Open final 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H including walkovers
16 – 5
21 main-draw results
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-0 Andrea Jaeger #8 Match data May 6, 1984* F South African Open WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 7-5 Andrea Jaeger Match data Nov 26, 1983* SF Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jun 4, 1983* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-3 6-3 Andrea Jaeger Match data Feb 5, 1983* F Palm Beach WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Andrea Jaeger Match data Dec 12, 1982* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Nov 21, 1982* F Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 3-6 6-1 6-4 Andrea Jaeger Match data Oct 17, 1982* F Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Oct 10, 1982* F Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Sep 12, 1982* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-1 Chris Evert Match data Jun 5, 1982* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Apr 25, 1982* F Amelia Island WTA 250 Clay
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 1-6 6-2 Chris Evert Match data Apr 10, 1982* SF Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Andrea Jaeger 7-6 6-4 Chris Evert Match data Feb 28, 1982* F Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 4-6 6-3 6-0 Andrea Jaeger Match data Oct 18, 1981* F Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 4-6 6-1 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Aug 22, 1981* SF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Andrea Jaeger (w/o) Chris Evert Match data Jan 12, 1981* QF Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-4 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Oct 19, 1980* F Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-4 6-3 Andrea Jaeger Match data Aug 10, 1980* F Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jul 4, 1980* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jun 13, 1980* QF Chichester WTA 250 Grass
Andrea Jaeger (w/o) Chris Evert Match data Feb 3, 1980* BR Seattle WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,610 1,228 158 88.6% 18 0 5 13 112 154
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,266 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 4 1980 62–18 77.5% #7 2,143 0 4
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 11 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,178 0 7
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 15 1982 65–20 76.5% #3 2,201 0 9
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 27 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,103 0 10
19 1974 97–7 93.3% — 2,450 2 40 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,024 0 10
20 1975 85–7 92.4% #1 2,544 4 53 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,939 0 10
21 1976 63–5 92.6% #1 2,545 6 62 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,914 0 10
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,568 7 73 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,899 0 10
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,607 8 80 — — — — — — —
24 1979 81–14 85.3% #2 2,440 9 87 — — — — — — —
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,468 11 95 — — — — — — —
26 1981 64–9 87.7% #1 2,475 12 103 — — — — — — —
27 1982 66–6 91.7% #2 2,491 14 112 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,400 15 118 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,409 16 124 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,428 17 133 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,422 18 139 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,334 18 144 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,285 18 148 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 148 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 14 7 21 66.7%
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 40 0 40 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1975 26 2 28 92.9% 36 0 36 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1976 12 1 13 92.3% 11 0 11 100.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 18 4 22 81.8% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 326 37 363 89.8% 418 26 444 94.1% 205 33 238 86.1% 279 62 341 81.8% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 20 86 76.7% 50 14 64 78.1% 75 34 109 68.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 1979 1522 114.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1980 2144 166.9 — — — — -20 -413 -289 74.1% +1.97 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) 111.4 -7.47
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1981 2178 174.5 — — — — +36 -158 -155 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.9 -9.68
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -7.71 1982 2202 173.8 — — — — +57 -30 -141 74.7% +1.94 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.09
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.17 1983 2104 170.1 — — — — -4 +148 +47 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -3.88
19 1974 2450 180.5 — — — — -56 +162 -92 88.2% +3.37 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.59 1984 2024 144.8 — — — — +14 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
20 1975 2544 181.4 — — — — -55 +162 -225 89.2% +3.37 8–3 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 -5.18 1985 1939 112.7 — — — — +11 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.47
21 1976 2546 179.8 — — — — +44 +128 -121 86.5% +3.11 10–2 (83%) 6–4 (60%) 101.6 -3.21 1986 1914 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1977 2568 181.6 — — — — +148 +144 -101 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 -2.88 1987 1900 104.0 — — — — — +249 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.16
23 1978 2608 179.5 — — — — +105 +63 -131 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 2440 178.4 — — — — +13 +292 +61 81.2% +2.78 12–2 (86%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 -3.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 2469 177.6 — — — — +80 +330 +100 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -4.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 2476 182.2 — — — — +9 +291 +130 86.1% +3.10 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.6 -3.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 2491 179.3 — — — — +62 +255 +73 88.2% +3.33 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 98.0 -4.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 2400 176.5 — — — — +47 +316 +178 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 2410 175.5 — — — — +69 +207 +137 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.3 -4.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2429 176.4 — — — — +30 +241 +127 85.9% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 2423 177.3 — — — — +9 +241 +113 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 2335 176.3 — — — — +23 +294 +200 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.2 -4.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2286 173.9 — — — — +34 +319 +231 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.2 -3.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2167 158.6 — — — — +40 +347 +265 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2610 182.0 — — — — +21 +194 -3 84.5% +2.92 164–50 (77%) 82–50 (62%) 105.8 -5.37 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +18 -41 -153 71.0% +1.72 44–18 (71%) 21–18 (54%) 107.9 -8.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.