H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 17-5 (incl. walkovers)

Chris Evert vs Andrea Jaeger: 17–3 excluding walkovers; 17–5 including 2 walkovers. Across 22 main-draw results including walkovers, Chris Evert leads 5–2 on clay and 7–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1984 South African Open final 6-3 6-0.

USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H including walkovers
17 – 5
22 main-draw results
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-0 Andrea Jaeger #8 Match data May 6, 1984* F South African Open WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 7-5 Andrea Jaeger Match data Nov 26, 1983* SF Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jun 4, 1983* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-3 6-3 Andrea Jaeger Match data Feb 5, 1983* F Palm Beach WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Andrea Jaeger Match data Dec 12, 1982* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Nov 21, 1982* F Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 3-6 6-1 6-4 Andrea Jaeger Match data Oct 17, 1982* F Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Oct 10, 1982* F Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Sep 12, 1982* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-1 Chris Evert Match data Jun 5, 1982* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Apr 25, 1982* F Amelia Island Championships WTA 250 Clay
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 1-6 6-2 Chris Evert Match data Apr 10, 1982* SF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Chris Evert 6-1 7-5 Andrea Jaeger Match data Apr 4, 1982 F Citizen Cup (palm Beach Gardens) WTA 250 Clay
Andrea Jaeger 7-6 6-4 Chris Evert Match data Feb 28, 1982* F Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 4-6 6-3 6-0 Andrea Jaeger Match data Oct 18, 1981* F Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 4-6 6-1 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Aug 22, 1981* SF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Andrea Jaeger (w/o) Chris Evert Match data Jan 12, 1981* QF Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-4 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Oct 19, 1980* F Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-4 6-3 Andrea Jaeger Match data Aug 10, 1980* F Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jul 4, 1980* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jun 13, 1980* QF Chichester WTA 250 Grass
Andrea Jaeger (w/o) Chris Evert Match data Feb 3, 1980* BR Seattle WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11
19 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11
20 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11
21 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82 — — — — — — —
24 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90 — — — — — — —
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98 — — — — — — —
26 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107 — — — — — — —
27 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129 — — — — — — —
30 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1%
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08
19 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43
20 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48
21 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19
23 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.