H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Andrea Leand H2H: 5-0

Chris Evert holds a 5–0 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1989 Tokyo Pan Pacific fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Andrea Leand
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 4, 1989* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 R16 Carpet Chris Evert #3 6-2 4-6 6-3 Andrea Leand #285 Match data
Oct 4, 1984* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-4 Andrea Leand #36 Match data
May 5, 1984* Johannesburg WTA 250 QF Hard Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-2 Andrea Leand #37 Match data
Oct 16, 1982* Tampa WTA 250 SF Hard Chris Evert 6-1 6-2 Andrea Leand Match data
Oct 9, 1982* Deerfield Beach WTA 250 SF Hard Chris Evert 6-4 6-4 Andrea Leand Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Andrea Leand #857 #27 13 1,883 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Andrea Leand
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 — — — — — — —
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,564 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,814 0 0
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,786 0 0
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,774 0 1
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1985 1–5 16.7% #33 1,681 0 1
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1986 0–3 0.0% #214 1,628 0 1
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 — — — — — — —
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,608 0 1
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,580 0 1
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,517 0 1
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,505 0 1
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,474 0 1
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,473 0 1
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —