H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 6-0

Chris Evert holds a 6–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1985 Australian Open third round 4-6 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Dec 1, 1985* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Grass Chris Evert #2 4-6 6-4 6-0 Betsy Nagelsen #81 Match data
Jun 29, 1984* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Chris Evert #2 6-2 4-6 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen #81 Match data
Jun 20, 1984* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Chris Evert #2 6-1 7-5 Betsy Nagelsen #81 Match data
May 4, 1984* Johannesburg WTA 250 R16 Hard Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen #74 Match data
Nov 11, 1983* Deerfield Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Chris Evert 6-3 7-5 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Aug 24, 1974* Newport WTA 250 F Grass Chris Evert 6-4 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6