H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 6-0

Chris Evert holds a 6–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1985 Australian Open round of 32 4-6 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main-draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #2 4-6 6-4 6-0 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Dec 1, 1985* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert #2 6-2 4-6 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen #81 Match data Jun 29, 1984* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert #2 6-1 7-5 Betsy Nagelsen #81 Match data Jun 20, 1984* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen #74 Match data May 4, 1984* R16 South African Open WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-3 7-5 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Nov 11, 1983* R16 Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-4 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Aug 24, 1974* F Newport WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,610 1,228 158 88.6% 18 0 5 13 112 154
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,890 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 4 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 11 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 15 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 27 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3
19 1974 97–7 93.3% — 2,450 2 40 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 1975 85–7 92.4% #1 2,544 4 53 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,678 0 3
21 1976 63–5 92.6% #1 2,545 6 62 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,568 7 73 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,607 8 80 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,753 0 5
24 1979 81–14 85.3% #2 2,440 9 87 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,806 0 6
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,468 11 95 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,705 0 6
26 1981 64–9 87.7% #1 2,475 12 103 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 1982 66–6 91.7% #2 2,491 14 112 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,400 15 118 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,713 0 6
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,409 16 124 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,428 17 133 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,422 18 139 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,585 0 6
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,334 18 144 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,285 18 148 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,639 0 6
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 148 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,607 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,510 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,509 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Betsy Nagelsen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 40 0 40 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1975 26 2 28 92.9% 36 0 36 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1976 12 1 13 92.3% 11 0 11 100.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3%
24 1979 18 4 22 81.8% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — —
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 326 37 363 89.8% 418 26 444 94.1% 205 33 238 86.1% 279 62 341 81.8% — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Betsy Nagelsen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.55
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -7.71 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.58
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.17 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.05
19 1974 2450 180.5 — — — — -56 +162 -92 88.2% +3.37 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.59 1976 1709 124.2 — — — — -65 -116 +70 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.73
20 1975 2544 181.4 — — — — -55 +162 -225 89.2% +3.37 8–3 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 -5.18 1977 1678 123.8 — — — — -30 -105 +46 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
21 1976 2546 179.8 — — — — +44 +128 -121 86.5% +3.11 10–2 (83%) 6–4 (60%) 101.6 -3.21 1978 1659 129.6 — — — — -99 -85 +99 40.7% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.84
22 1977 2568 181.6 — — — — +148 +144 -101 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 -2.88 1979 1695 122.8 — — — — -132 — +12 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.65
23 1978 2608 179.5 — — — — +105 +63 -131 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.79 1980 1753 130.7 — — — — -148 — +40 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -1.78
24 1979 2440 178.4 — — — — +13 +292 +61 81.2% +2.78 12–2 (86%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 -3.99 1981 1806 134.9 — — — — -129 -305 +99 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.53
25 1980 2469 177.6 — — — — +80 +330 +100 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -4.31 1982 1705 123.2 — — — — -99 -214 +170 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 -0.40
26 1981 2476 182.2 — — — — +9 +291 +130 86.1% +3.10 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.6 -3.95 1983 1693 126.7 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.98
27 1982 2491 179.3 — — — — +62 +255 +73 88.2% +3.33 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 98.0 -4.01 1984 1631 126.4 — — — — +59 -141 +117 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.69
28 1983 2400 176.5 — — — — +47 +316 +178 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.38 1985 1714 129.5 — — — — -26 — +87 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.17
29 1984 2410 175.5 — — — — +69 +207 +137 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.3 -4.61 1986 1699 131.1 — — — — -55 — +171 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.66
30 1985 2429 176.4 — — — — +30 +241 +127 85.9% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -3.55 1987 1646 121.6 — — — — -24 — +148 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.69
31 1986 2423 177.3 — — — — +9 +241 +113 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.45 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -27 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.55
32 1987 2335 176.3 — — — — +23 +294 +200 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.2 -4.20 1989 1662 126.0 — — — — -56 — +96 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.48
33 1988 2286 173.9 — — — — +34 +319 +231 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.2 -3.52 1990 1640 115.0 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09
34 1989 2167 158.6 — — — — +40 +347 +265 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.18 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -52 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16
Career — 2610 182.0 — — — — +21 +194 -3 84.5% +2.92 164–50 (77%) 82–50 (62%) 105.8 -5.37 — 1891 131.9 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–128 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.1 +0.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.