H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 12-0

Chris Evert holds a 12–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on clay and 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1987 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.

USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
12 – 0
12 main-draw meetings
GER Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #3 6-1 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #10 Match data Jul 3, 1987* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert #2 6-2 7-5 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #9 Match data Feb 28, 1987* QF Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-4 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #5 Match data Apr 6, 1986* F Marco Island WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert #2 6-1 7-6(6) Claudia Kohde Kilsch #5 Match data Dec 8, 1985* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert #1 6-3 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #4 Match data Sep 6, 1985* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert #1 6-2 6-4 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #7 Match data Aug 11, 1985* F Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert #2 5-7 6-3 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #6 Match data Apr 20, 1985* SF Amelia Island Championships WTA 500 Clay
Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #8 Match data Feb 23, 1985* QF Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-4 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #11 Match data Jul 4, 1984* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #32 Match data Apr 15, 1984* F Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Chris Evert 6-1 7-5 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data Aug 20, 1983* QF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data May 27, 1981* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154
Claudia Kohde Kilsch — #4 77 2,158 401 234 63.1% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,754 0 1
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,839 0 5
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,910 0 8
19 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,020 0 9
21 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,118 0 10
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,051 0 10
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 2,019 0 10
24 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90 1988 39–19 67.2% #12 1,944 0 11
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,852 0 11
26 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,791 0 12
27 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,681 0 12
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,646 0 12
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129 — — — — — — —
30 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1980 — — — — 23 11 34 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 6 11 45.5%
20 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1984 11 4 15 73.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1985 16 4 20 80.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 6 15 60.0%
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7%
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% 1991 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1992 5 3 8 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8% — 79 44 123 64.2% 137 74 211 64.9% 94 47 141 66.7% 84 69 153 54.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1485 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.23
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1979 1481 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1980 1755 142.0 — — — — -175 +15 -97 63.0% +1.28 11–8 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.88
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05 1981 1840 144.2 — — — — -32 +102 -184 61.9% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 108.3 +1.73
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25 1982 1910 149.2 — — — — -38 -95 -105 56.3% +0.45 10–6 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 105.4 -3.08
19 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58 1983 1872 146.6 — — — — -38 -5 +24 57.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -1.59
20 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39 1984 2020 158.0 — — — — -104 +10 -20 68.9% +1.35 11–7 (61%) 7–2 (78%) 106.9 -0.59
21 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25 1985 2118 168.8 — — — — -41 -28 -48 67.3% +1.34 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 101.3 -5.52
22 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71 1986 2052 166.9 — — — — +4 +60 +33 69.2% +1.38 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 94.1 -3.57
23 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67 1987 2020 157.8 — — — — +25 +60 +92 66.1% +1.25 7–2 (78%) 6–4 (60%) 105.4 -3.94
24 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77 1988 1945 157.8 — — — — +22 +68 +214 66.7% +1.34 6–6 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 95.8 -2.17
25 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52 1989 1853 145.1 — — — — +52 — +233 50.7% +0.23 8–3 (73%) 0–6 (0%) 94.9 -0.60
26 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00 1990 1791 135.8 — — — — +1 +129 +295 50.6% +0.34 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 -1.35
27 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08 1991 1682 120.9 — — — — +20 +141 +305 46.8% -0.32 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) 93.8 +0.54
28 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42 1992 1646 122.3 — — — — +45 +113 +332 42.9% -0.62 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.52
29 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42 — 2159 157.6 — — — — -16 +44 +47 60.8% +0.85 99–69 (59%) 57–57 (50%) 100.8 -2.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.