H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC

Chris Evert vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 6-3

Chris Evert holds a 6–3 lead over Gabriela Sabatini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on clay, while Gabriela Sabatini leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1989 Key Biscayne final 6-1 4-6 6-2.

USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
ARG Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 26, 1989* Key Biscayne WTA 250 F Hard Gabriela Sabatini #3 6-1 4-6 6-2 Chris Evert #4 Match data
Aug 20, 1988* Montreal WTA 1000 SF Hard Gabriela Sabatini #5 6-4 6-3 Chris Evert #3 Match data
Aug 14, 1988* Los Angeles WTA 500 F Hard Chris Evert #3 2-6 6-1 6-1 Gabriela Sabatini #5 Match data
Mar 12, 1988* Boca Raton WTA 250 SF Hard Gabriela Sabatini #5 6-1 7-5 Chris Evert #3 Match data
Nov 7, 1987* Worcester WTA 250 SF Carpet Chris Evert #3 6-4 7-6 Gabriela Sabatini #6 Match data
Jun 3, 1986* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Chris Evert #2 1-6 6-3 6-3 Gabriela Sabatini #11 Match data
Jun 8, 1985* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-1 Gabriela Sabatini #17 Match data
Apr 20, 1985* Amelia Island WTA 250 QF Clay Chris Evert #2 6-1 1-6 6-3 Gabriela Sabatini #18 Match data
Apr 14, 1985* Hilton Head WTA 250 F Clay Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-0 Gabriela Sabatini #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Gabriela Sabatini #56 #3 228 2,398 607 182 76.9% 1 8 2 2 14 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Gabriela Sabatini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% 1,560 0 1 1984 7–5 58.3% #74 1,585 0 0
15 1970 14–4 77.8% 1,750 0 4 1985 48–18 72.7% #12 1,947 0 1
16 1971 28–2 93.3% 2,002 0 11 1986 49–21 70.0% #9 2,023 0 2
17 1972 45–8 84.9% 2,235 0 15 1987 62–16 79.5% #6 2,264 0 5
18 1973 86–9 90.5% 2,359 0 27 1988 61–13 82.4% #4 2,276 0 9
19 1974 93–7 93.0% 2,438 2 39 1989 58–12 82.9% #3 2,257 0 13
20 1975 84–7 92.3% 2,508 4 51 1990 49–14 77.8% #5 2,231 1 15
21 1976 63–5 92.6% 2,525 6 60 1991 62–11 84.9% #3 2,269 1 20
22 1977 63–4 94.0% 2,553 7 71 1992 65–12 84.4% #3 2,291 1 25
23 1978 49–4 92.5% 2,568 8 78 1993 51–18 73.9% #5 2,108 1 25
24 1979 81–14 85.3% 2,394 9 85 1994 42–17 71.2% #7 2,055 1 26
25 1980 66–9 88.0% 2,417 11 93 1995 41–16 71.9% #7 2,062 1 27
26 1981 64–9 87.7% 2,423 12 101 1996 12–9 57.1% #56 1,947 1 27
27 1982 66–6 91.7% 2,459 14 110
28 1983 59–11 84.3% 2,353 15 116
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146