H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chris Evert vs Jo Durie H2H: 5-0

Chris Evert holds a 5–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1984 Montreal quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 25, 1984* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-3 Jo Durie #10 Match data
Oct 23, 1983* Brighton WTA 250 F Carpet Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Jo Durie Match data
Sep 11, 1983* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Chris Evert 6-4 6-4 Jo Durie Match data
Aug 13, 1983* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Chris Evert 7-5 6-2 Jo Durie Match data
May 14, 1981* Lugano WTA 250 R32 Clay Chris Evert 6-0 6-0 Jo Durie Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9