H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Julie Heldman H2H: 11-2

Chris Evert holds an 11–2 lead over Julie Heldman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 5–1 on grass and 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1975 Boston quarterfinal 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
11 – 2
13 main-draw meetings
Julie Heldman
USA Age 80 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert 6-0 6-3 Julie Heldman Match data Mar 8, 1975* QF Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-2 6-2 Julie Heldman Match data Feb 15, 1975* QF Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-2 6-2 Julie Heldman Match data Aug 23, 1974* SF Newport WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert 6-0 6-3 Julie Heldman Match data Aug 18, 1974* F Canadian Open WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-0 7-5 Julie Heldman Match data Jun 13, 1974* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-2 6-3 Julie Heldman Match data Dec 26, 1973 SF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-2 6-4 Julie Heldman Match data Oct 20, 1973* QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Clay
Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Julie Heldman Match data Jul 1, 1973* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Julie Heldman 6-4 6-2 Chris Evert Match data Jun 23, 1973* QF London Rothmans WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert 6-1 6-2 Julie Heldman Match data Sep 7, 1972* R16 US Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Julie Heldman Match data Aug 28, 1972* BR Newport WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert 6-1 6-2 Julie Heldman Match data Apr 11, 1971* F St. Petersburg WTA 500 Clay
Julie Heldman 6-4 6-1 Chris Evert Match data Mar 24, 1969* QF Pompano Beach WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154
Julie Heldman — — — 2,133 381 159 70.6% 0 0 0 0 21 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Julie Heldman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4 — — — — — — —
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8 — — — — — — —
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20 — — — — — — —
19 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36 — — — — — — —
20 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52 — — — — — — —
21 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64 — — — — — — —
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75 1968 53–15 77.9% — 1,811 0 6
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82 1969 74–17 81.3% — 2,020 0 14
24 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90 1970 29–12 70.7% — 1,959 0 15
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98 1971 41–23 64.1% — 2,031 0 16
26 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107 1972 32–26 55.2% — 1,962 0 16
27 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117 1973 68–31 68.7% — 2,074 0 19
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123 1974 60–21 74.1% — 2,089 0 21
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129 1975 24–14 63.2% — 1,995 0 21
30 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Julie Heldman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1968 8 3 11 72.7% 37 7 44 84.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1969 13 3 16 81.3% 32 4 36 88.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 16 6 22 72.7%
24 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% 1970 — — — — 19 6 25 76.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% 1971 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 13 10 23 56.5%
26 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1972 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7%
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% 1973 10 4 14 71.4% 17 7 24 70.8% 24 6 30 80.0% 17 14 31 54.8%
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1974 — — — — 24 10 34 70.6% 21 5 26 80.8% 15 6 21 71.4%
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 11 5 16 68.8%
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8% — 46 19 65 70.8% 155 52 207 74.9% 85 33 118 72.0% 89 54 143 62.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Julie Heldman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71 1968 1811 138.4 — — — — -128 +140 -203 73.8% +2.05 10–3 (77%) — — -1.49
23 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67 1969 2021 153.7 — — — — +84 +69 -264 74.9% +2.13 16–5 (76%) — — -8.73
24 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77 1970 1960 152.1 — — — — — +143 -157 70.9% +1.83 3–5 (38%) — — -3.54
25 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52 1971 2032 159.2 — — — — +11 +32 -114 62.0% +1.18 10–8 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 97.7 -6.66
26 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00 1972 1963 153.4 — — — — +119 +20 -75 55.3% +0.34 7–9 (44%) 4–0 (100%) 98.9 -9.31
27 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08 1973 2075 159.9 — — — — -31 -45 +40 66.5% +1.41 12–9 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 97.9 -10.12
28 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42 1974 2089 159.9 — — — — -1 -2 +80 69.7% +1.48 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.8 -5.81
29 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58 1975 1995 149.5 — — — — +96 -22 — 59.0% +0.87 6–3 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 98.1 -3.03
30 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42 — 2133 158.8 — — — — +33 +56 -56 67.3% +1.47 75–48 (61%) 14–18 (44%) 100.6 -9.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.