H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Kate Latham H2H: 8-0

Chris Evert holds a 8–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1983 Manhattan Beach semifinal 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
8 – 0
8 main draw meetings
Kate Latham
Age 73

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 1983* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 SF Hard Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Kate Latham Match data
Sep 6, 1982* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Chris Evert 6-2 6-1 Kate Latham Match data
Jun 27, 1982* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Kate Latham Match data
Sep 4, 1981* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Chris Evert 6-0 6-1 Kate Latham Match data
Aug 17, 1981 Toronto WTA 250 R16 Hard Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Kate Latham Match data
May 31, 1979* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Kate Latham Match data
Feb 10, 1977* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Chris Evert 6-1 6-2 Kate Latham Match data
Jul 29, 1973* Cleveland WTA 250 R16 Hard Chris Evert 6-1 6-2 Kate Latham Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Kate Latham — — — 1,866 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,476 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 — — — — — — —
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,503 0 0
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,844 0 3
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,690 0 3
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,680 0 3
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,755 0 3
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,661 0 3
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,848 0 3
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,688 0 5
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 6
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,494 0 6
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,528 0 6
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —