H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 2-0

Chris Evert holds a 2–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1978 Eastbourne fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 1978* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Chris Evert 6-3 6-1 Lea Antonoplis Match data
Oct 2, 1975* Mission Viejo WTA 250 R32 Hard Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Lea Antonoplis Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,774 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,579 0 0
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,559 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,626 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,665 0 0
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,717 0 0
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,724 0 1
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,735 0 2
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,719 0 2
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,572 0 2
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,460 0 2
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,413 0 2
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,455 0 2
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,448 0 2
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,432 0 2
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —