H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chris Evert vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 2-0

Chris Evert holds a 2–0 lead over Leigh Anne Thompson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1983 Brighton fourth round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Leigh Anne Thompson
Age 62

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 1983* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Leigh Anne Thompson Match data
Oct 30, 1982* Brighton WTA 250 QF Carpet Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Leigh Anne Thompson Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Leigh Anne Thompson — — — 1,793 42 73 36.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Leigh Anne Thompson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 — — — — — — —
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1981 4–5 44.4% — 1,542 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,766 0 1
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1983 7–17 29.2% — 1,705 0 1
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1984 0–8 0.0% — 1,582 0 1
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1985 6–11 35.3% — 1,590 0 1
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1986 5–9 35.7% — 1,553 0 1
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 — — — — — — —
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 — — — — — — —
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 — — — — — — —
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 — — — — — — —
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —