H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chris Evert vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 3-2

Chris Evert holds a 3–2 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1989 Tokyo Pan Pacific quarterfinal 6-2 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 5, 1989* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 QF Carpet Lori Mcneil #12 6-2 5-7 6-4 Chris Evert #3 Match data
Oct 4, 1987* New Orleans WTA 250 F Carpet Chris Evert #3 6-3 7-5 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data
Sep 11, 1987* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Lori Mcneil #12 3-6 6-2 6-4 Chris Evert #3 Match data
Aug 15, 1987* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Chris Evert #3 6-1 7-5 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data
May 23, 1987* Geneva WTA 250 SF Clay Chris Evert #3 6-0 6-2 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11