Home
/
H2H
/
Chris Evert vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Chris Evert vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 16-2
Chris Evert holds a 16–2 lead over Manuela Maleeva Fragniere in their WTA head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 5–2 on clay and 6–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1988 Chicago semifinal 6-4 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
16
–
2
18 main-draw meetings
SUI
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Chris Evert
#3
6-4 2-6 6-2
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#7
Match data
Nov 12, 1988*
SF
Chicago
WTA 250
Carpet
Chris Evert
#3
3-6 6-4 6-2
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#8
Match data
Sep 8, 1988*
QF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Chris Evert
#3
7-5 6-4
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#9
Match data
Sep 9, 1987*
R16
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Chris Evert
#3
6-3 4-6 6-2
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#8
Match data
May 24, 1987*
F
Geneva
WTA 250
Clay
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#11
6-1 2-7 7-6
Chris Evert
#3
Match data
Apr 11, 1987*
SF
Hilton Head
WTA 250
Clay
Chris Evert
#2
6-2 6-2
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#9
Match data
Sep 5, 1986*
QF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Chris Evert
#2
3-6 6-0 6-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#10
Match data
Aug 16, 1986*
QF
Los Angeles
WTA 500
Hard
Chris Evert
#2
6-1 6-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#8
Match data
Feb 1, 1986*
SF
Key Biscayne
WTA 250
Hard
Chris Evert
#2
6-3 6-3
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#9
Match data
Dec 6, 1985*
QF
Australian Open
Grand Slam
Grass
Chris Evert
#1
7-5 6-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#8
Match data
Nov 17, 1985*
F
Tokyo Lion Cup
WTA 250
Carpet
Chris Evert
#2
7-5 6-3
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#10
Match data
Oct 27, 1985*
F
Brighton
WTA 250
Carpet
Chris Evert
#2
3-6 6-3 6-2
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#9
Match data
Jun 5, 1984*
R16
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#13
6-3 6-3
Chris Evert
#2
Match data
May 27, 1984*
F
Perugia
WTA 250
Clay
Chris Evert
#2
6-1 6-1
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#19
Match data
Apr 21, 1984*
SF
Amelia Island
Category 4
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Clay
Chris Evert
#2
6-1 4-6 6-3
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#20
Match data
Apr 13, 1984*
R16
Hilton Head
Category 4
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Clay
Chris Evert
#2
3-6 6-3 6-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#24
Match data
Mar 17, 1984*
QF
Palm Beach
WTA 250
Clay
Chris Evert
#2
6-4 6-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#25
Match data
Feb 25, 1984*
SF
East Hanover
WTA 250
Carpet
Chris Evert
6-4 6-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Match data
Sep 5, 1983*
R32
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Chris Evert
#10
#1
231
2,610
1,228
158
88.6%
18
0
5
13
112
154
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
#5
#3
148
2,130
464
185
71.5%
0
1
0
3
15
19
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
14
1969
4–2
66.7%
—
1,560
0
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15
1970
14–4
77.8%
—
1,744
0
4
1982
15–10
60.0%
—
1,687
0
0
16
1971
28–2
93.3%
—
2,003
0
11
1983
21–16
56.8%
—
1,788
0
0
17
1972
45–8
84.9%
—
2,249
0
15
1984
50–16
75.8%
#6
2,100
0
5
18
1973
86–9
90.5%
—
2,374
0
27
1985
46–18
71.9%
#7
2,074
0
6
19
1974
97–7
93.3%
—
2,450
2
40
1986
42–21
66.7%
#8
1,992
0
6
20
1975
85–7
92.4%
#1
2,544
4
53
1987
44–15
74.6%
#8
2,113
0
8
21
1976
63–5
92.6%
#1
2,545
6
62
1988
45–15
75.0%
#6
2,101
0
10
22
1977
63–4
94.0%
#1
2,568
7
73
1989
34–13
72.3%
#9
2,018
0
12
23
1978
49–4
92.5%
#2
2,607
8
80
1990
42–16
72.4%
#9
2,068
0
12
24
1979
81–14
85.3%
#2
2,440
9
87
1991
43–14
75.4%
#10
2,027
0
15
25
1980
66–9
88.0%
#1
2,468
11
95
1992
34–13
72.3%
#9
1,998
0
16
26
1981
64–9
87.7%
#1
2,475
12
103
1993
36–16
69.2%
#11
2,045
0
18
27
1982
66–6
91.7%
#2
2,491
14
112
1994
12–2
85.7%
#5
2,067
0
19
28
1983
59–11
84.3%
#2
2,400
15
118
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
29
1984
68–8
89.5%
#2
2,409
16
124
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30
1985
77–8
90.6%
#2
2,428
17
133
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
1986
56–6
90.3%
#2
2,422
18
139
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
1987
68–12
85.0%
#3
2,334
18
144
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
1988
62–13
82.7%
#3
2,285
18
148
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
1989
27–10
73.0%
#10
2,167
18
148
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
14
1969
—
—
—
—
4
2
6
66.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15
1970
—
—
—
—
14
2
16
87.5%
0
2
2
0.0%
—
—
—
—
1982
2
2
4
50.0%
7
4
11
63.6%
6
4
10
60.0%
—
—
—
—
16
1971
—
—
—
—
20
1
21
95.2%
8
1
9
88.9%
—
—
—
—
1983
3
2
5
60.0%
16
10
26
61.5%
2
3
5
40.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
17
1972
3
1
4
75.0%
19
2
21
90.5%
18
3
21
85.7%
5
2
7
71.4%
1984
5
4
9
55.6%
27
5
32
84.4%
4
1
5
80.0%
14
6
20
70.0%
18
1973
17
1
18
94.4%
46
4
50
92.0%
15
4
19
78.9%
8
0
8
100.0%
1985
7
4
11
63.6%
16
6
22
72.7%
10
3
13
76.9%
13
5
18
72.2%
19
1974
19
1
20
95.0%
40
0
40
100.0%
24
2
26
92.3%
14
4
18
77.8%
1986
13
5
18
72.2%
13
6
19
68.4%
7
2
9
77.8%
9
8
17
52.9%
20
1975
26
2
28
92.9%
36
0
36
100.0%
5
2
7
71.4%
18
3
21
85.7%
1987
9
3
12
75.0%
19
5
24
79.2%
6
3
9
66.7%
10
4
14
71.4%
21
1976
12
1
13
92.3%
11
0
11
100.0%
9
0
9
100.0%
31
4
35
88.6%
1988
23
5
28
82.1%
9
4
13
69.2%
0
1
1
0.0%
13
5
18
72.2%
22
1977
12
0
12
100.0%
12
0
12
100.0%
8
2
10
80.0%
31
2
33
93.9%
1989
15
5
20
75.0%
11
3
14
78.6%
—
—
—
—
8
5
13
61.5%
23
1978
17
0
17
100.0%
5
0
5
100.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
17
2
19
89.5%
1990
19
6
25
76.0%
7
3
10
70.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
16
6
22
72.7%
24
1979
18
4
22
81.8%
20
1
21
95.2%
12
1
13
92.3%
31
8
39
79.5%
1991
16
7
23
69.6%
10
3
13
76.9%
—
—
—
—
17
4
21
81.0%
25
1980
17
0
17
100.0%
16
0
16
100.0%
10
1
11
90.9%
23
8
31
74.2%
1992
13
4
17
76.5%
13
6
19
68.4%
2
1
3
66.7%
6
2
8
75.0%
26
1981
14
2
16
87.5%
25
1
26
96.2%
16
1
17
94.1%
9
5
14
64.3%
1993
16
5
21
76.2%
8
7
15
53.3%
1
1
2
50.0%
11
3
14
78.6%
27
1982
24
1
25
96.0%
22
2
24
91.7%
10
1
11
90.9%
10
2
12
83.3%
1994
4
1
5
80.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8
1
9
88.9%
28
1983
19
3
22
86.4%
22
0
22
100.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
16
7
23
69.6%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
29
1984
21
1
22
95.5%
24
3
27
88.9%
16
2
18
88.9%
7
2
9
77.8%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30
1985
21
2
23
91.3%
21
1
22
95.5%
16
2
18
88.9%
19
3
22
86.4%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
1986
21
2
23
91.3%
20
1
21
95.2%
5
1
6
83.3%
10
2
12
83.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
1987
18
5
23
78.3%
23
2
25
92.0%
9
2
11
81.8%
18
3
21
85.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
1988
33
6
39
84.6%
13
2
15
86.7%
5
1
6
83.3%
11
4
15
73.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
1989
14
5
19
73.7%
5
2
7
71.4%
7
2
9
77.8%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
326
37
363
89.8%
418
26
444
94.1%
205
33
238
86.1%
279
62
341
81.8%
—
145
53
198
73.2%
156
62
218
71.6%
38
20
58
65.5%
125
50
175
71.4%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.