H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 16-2

Chris Evert holds a 16–2 lead over Manuela Maleeva Fragniere in their WTA head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 5–2 on clay and 6–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1988 Chicago semifinal 6-4 2-6 6-2.

USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
16 2
18 main-draw meetings
SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #3 6-4 2-6 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #7 Match data Nov 12, 1988* SF Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #3 3-6 6-4 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 Match data Sep 8, 1988* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert #3 7-5 6-4 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data Sep 9, 1987* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert #3 6-3 4-6 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 Match data May 24, 1987* F Geneva WTA 250 Clay
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #11 6-1 2-7 7-6 Chris Evert #3 Match data Apr 11, 1987* SF Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data Sep 5, 1986* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chris Evert #2 3-6 6-0 6-0 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 Match data Aug 16, 1986* QF Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert #2 6-1 6-0 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 Match data Feb 1, 1986* SF Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-3 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data Dec 6, 1985* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert #1 7-5 6-0 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 Match data Nov 17, 1985* F Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #2 7-5 6-3 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 Match data Oct 27, 1985* F Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #2 3-6 6-3 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 Match data Jun 5, 1984* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #13 6-3 6-3 Chris Evert #2 Match data May 27, 1984* F Perugia WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert #2 6-1 6-1 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #19 Match data Apr 21, 1984* SF Amelia Island Category 4 modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Chris Evert #2 6-1 4-6 6-3 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #20 Match data Apr 13, 1984* R16 Hilton Head Category 4 modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Chris Evert #2 3-6 6-3 6-0 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #24 Match data Mar 17, 1984* QF Palm Beach WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-0 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #25 Match data Feb 25, 1984* SF East Hanover WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-4 6-0 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Match data Sep 5, 1983* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,610 1,228 158 88.6% 18 0 5 13 112 154
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 #3 148 2,130 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 3 15 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% 1,560 0 1
15 1970 14–4 77.8% 1,744 0 4 1982 15–10 60.0% 1,687 0 0
16 1971 28–2 93.3% 2,003 0 11 1983 21–16 56.8% 1,788 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% 2,249 0 15 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5
18 1973 86–9 90.5% 2,374 0 27 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,074 0 6
19 1974 97–7 93.3% 2,450 2 40 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6
20 1975 85–7 92.4% #1 2,544 4 53 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,113 0 8
21 1976 63–5 92.6% #1 2,545 6 62 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,101 0 10
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,568 7 73 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,018 0 12
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,607 8 80 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12
24 1979 81–14 85.3% #2 2,440 9 87 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,027 0 15
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,468 11 95 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16
26 1981 64–9 87.7% #1 2,475 12 103 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,045 0 18
27 1982 66–6 91.7% #2 2,491 14 112 1994 12–2 85.7% #5 2,067 0 19
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,400 15 118
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,409 16 124
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,428 17 133
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,422 18 139
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,334 18 144
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,285 18 148
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 148

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 4 2 6 66.7%
15 1970 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0%
16 1971 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 40 0 40 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9%
20 1975 26 2 28 92.9% 36 0 36 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4%
21 1976 12 1 13 92.3% 11 0 11 100.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 5 13 61.5%
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7%
24 1979 18 4 22 81.8% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 17 4 21 81.0%
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% 1994 4 1 5 80.0% 8 1 9 88.9%
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8%
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4%
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3%
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7%
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3%
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 326 37 363 89.8% 418 26 444 94.1% 205 33 238 86.1% 279 62 341 81.8% 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 +24 63.6% +1.18 0–1 +0.13
15 1970 1745 152.4 +83 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 -0.34 1982 1687 121.9 -88 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.61
16 1971 2004 157.6 +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1983 1788 136.4 -118 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.81
17 1972 2250 173.8 -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -7.71 1984 2100 169.1 -162 +37 -327 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.5 -2.65
18 1973 2374 178.1 -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.17 1985 2075 161.4 -47 +9 -202 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 +0.26
19 1974 2450 180.5 -56 +162 -92 88.2% +3.37 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.59 1986 1992 161.4 -4 +32 -50 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.2 -2.54
20 1975 2544 181.4 -55 +162 -225 89.2% +3.37 8–3 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 -5.18 1987 2114 165.6 -24 -9 -171 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -3.96
21 1976 2546 179.8 +44 +128 -121 86.5% +3.11 10–2 (83%) 6–4 (60%) 101.6 -3.21 1988 2102 162.5 +47 -50 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.34
22 1977 2568 181.6 +148 +144 -101 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 -2.88 1989 2019 154.6 +29 +17 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.98
23 1978 2608 179.5 +105 +63 -131 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 -2.79 1990 2068 173.2 +58 -41 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84
24 1979 2440 178.4 +13 +292 +61 81.2% +2.78 12–2 (86%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 -3.99 1991 2028 159.1 +51 +26 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33
25 1980 2469 177.6 +80 +330 +100 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -4.31 1992 1999 152.0 +87 +17 -90 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30
26 1981 2476 182.2 +9 +291 +130 86.1% +3.10 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.6 -3.95 1993 2046 159.7 +80 -115 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01
27 1982 2491 179.3 +62 +255 +73 88.2% +3.33 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 98.0 -4.01 1994 2067 143.1 +48 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 +0.52
28 1983 2400 176.5 +47 +316 +178 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.38
29 1984 2410 175.5 +69 +207 +137 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.3 -4.61
30 1985 2429 176.4 +30 +241 +127 85.9% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -3.55
31 1986 2423 177.3 +9 +241 +113 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.45
32 1987 2335 176.3 +23 +294 +200 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.2 -4.20
33 1988 2286 173.9 +34 +319 +231 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.2 -3.52
34 1989 2167 158.6 +40 +347 +265 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.18
Career 2610 182.0 +21 +194 -3 84.5% +2.92 164–50 (77%) 82–50 (62%) 105.8 -5.37 2131 166.2 +16 -4 -133 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.