H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 7-0

Chris Evert holds a 7–0 lead over Mary Joe Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1989 Key Biscayne fourth round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 24, 1989* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R16 Hard Chris Evert #4 7-5 6-2 Mary Joe Fernandez #13 Match data
Mar 18, 1989* Boca Raton WTA 250 QF Hard Chris Evert #4 6-2 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #13 Match data
Mar 19, 1988* Key Biscayne WTA 250 SF Hard Chris Evert #3 6-2 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #20 Match data
Oct 17, 1987* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Carpet Chris Evert #3 6-2 5-7 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #26 Match data
May 23, 1987* Geneva WTA 250 QF Clay Chris Evert #3 7-6 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #18 Match data
Sep 1, 1986* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-2 Mary Joe Fernandez #24 Match data
Jun 25, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —