H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chris Evert vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 2-0

Chris Evert holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1987 Houston third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 23, 1987* Houston WTA 250 R32 Clay Chris Evert #4 6-1 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #48 Match data
May 29, 1986* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #107 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —