H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 1-0

Chris Evert holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Evert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1988 Rome third round 7-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 1988* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Chris Evert #3 7-6 6-0 Nicole Bradtke #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —