H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 4-0

Chris Evert holds a 4–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1980 Roland Garros third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 1, 1980* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Mar 15, 1979* Boston WTA 250 R32 Carpet Chris Evert 6-2 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Feb 28, 1974* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Chris Evert 6-3 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Mar 8, 1970* Pompano Beach WTA 250 R16 Clay Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,926 245 296 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 — — — — — — —
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,509 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,506 0 0
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,629 0 1
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,681 0 1
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,874 0 1
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1973 21–22 48.8% — 1,846 0 1
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,905 0 3
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,815 0 3
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,775 0 3
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,783 0 3
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,740 0 3
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,748 0 3
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,788 0 4
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,653 0 4
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,616 0 4
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4