H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Chris Evert vs Patty Fendick H2H: 3-0

Chris Evert holds a 3–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1989 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 5, 1989* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Chris Evert #4 6-2 6-2 Patty Fendick #23 Match data
Aug 13, 1988* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Chris Evert #3 6-4 6-0 Patty Fendick #22 Match data
Jan 17, 1988* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Chris Evert #3 4-6 6-1 6-1 Patty Fendick #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 — — — — — — —
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —