H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Patty Fendick H2H: 3-0

Chris Evert holds a 3–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1989 Wimbledon round of 16 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #4 6-2 6-2 Patty Fendick #23 Match data Jul 5, 1989* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert #3 6-4 6-0 Patty Fendick #22 Match data Aug 13, 1988* QF Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert #3 4-6 6-1 6-1 Patty Fendick #49 Match data Jan 17, 1988* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154
Patty Fendick — #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4 — — — — — — —
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0
21 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3
26 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3
27 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3
30 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Patty Fendick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8% — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Patty Fendick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05 1982 1500 107.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +82 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +1.00
19 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32
20 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +32 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.31
21 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25 1986 1643 127.6 — — — — -8 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36
22 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71 1987 1674 134.6 — — — — -14 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.41
23 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67 1988 1798 142.3 — — — — +12 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.30
24 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77 1989 1763 138.7 — — — — +29 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.23
25 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52 1990 1740 136.1 — — — — +4 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10
26 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -90 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64
27 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -33 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86
28 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42 1993 1840 147.9 — — — — -10 — +29 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37
29 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58 1994 1725 142.3 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50
30 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85 1995 1691 136.0 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51
31 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42 — 1883 144.9 — — — — +11 -96 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.