H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 4-2 (incl. walkovers)

Chris Evert vs Raffaella Reggi Concato: 4–1 excluding walkovers; 4–2 including 1 walkover. Across 6 main-draw results including walkovers, Chris Evert leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1989 Eastbourne Open round of 16 W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H including walkovers
4 – 2
6 main-draw results
Raffaella Reggi Concato
ITA Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Raffaella Reggi Concato (w/o) Chris Evert #4 Match data Jun 23, 1989* R16 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert #3 6-3 6-1 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data Oct 15, 1988* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Raffaella Reggi Concato 2-6 6-4 6-1 Chris Evert #3 Match data Sep 27, 1988* R16 Seoul Olympics Olympics Hard
Chris Evert #3 6-4 6-1 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data Oct 16, 1987* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Chris Evert #3 6-2 6-2 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data Jun 4, 1987* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-0 6-3 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data Aug 30, 1985* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154
Raffaella Reggi Concato — — — 1,930 260 178 59.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Raffaella Reggi Concato
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,421 0 0
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,414 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8 1983 21–20 51.2% — 1,668 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20 1984 17–14 54.8% — 1,753 0 0
19 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36 1985 26–19 57.8% — 1,783 0 1
20 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52 1986 31–20 60.8% — 1,896 0 3
21 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64 1987 39–21 65.0% — 1,904 0 4
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75 1988 30–16 65.2% — 1,911 0 4
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82 1989 39–22 63.9% — 1,856 0 4
24 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90 1990 31–16 66.0% — 1,816 0 5
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98 1991 11–11 50.0% — 1,707 0 5
26 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107 1992 14–12 53.8% — 1,723 0 5
27 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129 — — — — — — —
30 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1986 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 20 10 30 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1989 20 11 31 64.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% 1990 22 12 34 64.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8% — 101 67 168 60.1% 102 57 159 64.2% 23 17 40 57.5% 34 34 68 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.12
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1981 1421 91.5 — — — — — — — 23.1% -2.39 0–3 (0%) — — +0.24
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1982 1414 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05 1983 1669 126.1 — — — — +20 -51 -56 47.3% -0.21 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 109.6 0.00
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25 1984 1754 129.5 — — — — -113 +30 -124 55.2% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 -0.99
19 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58 1985 1784 138.5 — — — — -146 +128 — 54.2% +0.26 11–6 (65%) 4–5 (44%) 102.7 +0.43
20 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39 1986 1897 151.9 — — — — -62 +67 -239 57.6% +0.70 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 -1.96
21 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25 1987 1904 144.7 — — — — -18 +25 -206 62.5% +0.81 9–9 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 99.9 +0.52
22 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71 1988 1912 144.0 — — — — +15 -21 -182 61.0% +0.50 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 106.8 -1.34
23 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67 1989 1856 141.5 — — — — -4 +23 -72 59.4% +0.69 12–8 (60%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 +0.39
24 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77 1990 1816 143.0 — — — — +36 +79 -27 61.5% +0.89 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 100.3 +0.44
25 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52 1991 1708 117.7 — — — — +34 +163 — 49.0% -0.35 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +1.53
26 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00 1992 1723 128.3 — — — — +7 +121 — 52.5% -0.02 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 103.2 -0.10
27 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42 — 1930 143.9 — — — — -14 +46 -117 56.4% +0.38 82–52 (61%) 47–22 (68%) 113.8 -0.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.