H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Evert vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-0

Chris Evert holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1988 Boca Raton quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 12, 1988* Boca Raton WTA 250 QF Hard Chris Evert #3 6-1 6-0 Sandra Cecchini #16 Match data
May 25, 1984* Perugia WTA 250 R16 Clay Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-0 Sandra Cecchini #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —