H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chris Evert vs Sara Gomer H2H: 4-0

Chris Evert holds a 4–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1989 Eastbourne third round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Sara Gomer
GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 1989* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Chris Evert #4 6-2 6-0 Sara Gomer #60 Match data
Aug 17, 1987 Toronto WTA 250 R32 Hard Chris Evert #3 6-3 6-2 Sara Gomer #62 Match data
Jun 24, 1987* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Chris Evert #3 6-1 6-0 Sara Gomer #49 Match data
Jun 21, 1984* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Chris Evert #2 6-1 6-4 Sara Gomer #170 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Sara Gomer #317 #46 18 1,778 104 130 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Sara Gomer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1980 2–1 66.7% — 1,519 0 0
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1981 7–8 46.7% — 1,517 0 0
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1982 6–4 60.0% — 1,546 0 0
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,533 0 0
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,512 0 0
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1985 10–15 40.0% #101 1,569 0 0
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,679 0 0
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 1988 19–15 55.9% #51 1,744 0 1
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,635 0 1
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 1992 4–9 30.8% #173 1,577 0 1
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —