H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chris Evert vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 7-0

Chris Evert holds a 7–0 lead over Stephanie Rehe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1988 Chicago fourth round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Stephanie Rehe
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 11, 1988* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Chris Evert #3 (w/o) Stephanie Rehe #15 Match data
Oct 8, 1988* New Orleans WTA 250 SF Hard Chris Evert #3 6-1 6-1 Stephanie Rehe #16 Match data
Aug 13, 1988* Los Angeles WTA 500 SF Hard Chris Evert #3 6-3 6-3 Stephanie Rehe #25 Match data
Mar 21, 1987* Dallas WTA 250 QF Carpet Chris Evert #3 6-1 6-0 Stephanie Rehe #16 Match data
Feb 27, 1987* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R16 Hard Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-2 Stephanie Rehe #19 Match data
Apr 12, 1986* Hilton Head WTA 250 SF Clay Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-1 Stephanie Rehe #18 Match data
Feb 1, 1986* Key Biscayne WTA 250 QF Hard Chris Evert #2 6-1 6-0 Stephanie Rehe #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146
Stephanie Rehe #156 #10 60 2,000 134 98 57.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Stephanie Rehe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
11 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1983 0–4 0.0% — 1,471 0 0
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1984 1–5 16.7% #182 1,461 0 0
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4 1985 23–12 65.7% #18 1,805 0 2
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11 1986 25–16 61.0% #19 1,824 0 2
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15 1987 17–8 68.0% #28 1,868 0 3
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27 1988 43–19 69.4% #14 1,965 0 5
19 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39 — — — — — — —
20 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51 1990 7–6 53.8% #58 1,968 0 5
21 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60 1991 5–12 29.4% #123 1,766 0 5
22 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71 1992 9–13 40.9% #74 1,744 0 5
23 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78 1993 3–2 60.0% #156 1,758 0 5
24 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85 — — — — — — —
25 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93 — — — — — — —
26 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101 — — — — — — —
27 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142 — — — — — — —
33 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146 — — — — — — —