H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Chris Evert vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 7-0 (incl. walkovers)

Chris Evert vs Stephanie Rehe: 6–0 excluding walkovers; 7–0 including 1 walkover. Across 7 main-draw results including walkovers, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1988 Chicago round of 16 W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H including walkovers
7 – 0
7 main-draw results
Stephanie Rehe
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #3 (w/o) Stephanie Rehe #15 Match data Nov 11, 1988* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #3 6-1 6-1 Stephanie Rehe #16 Match data Oct 8, 1988* SF New Orleans WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert #3 6-3 6-3 Stephanie Rehe #25 Match data Aug 13, 1988* SF Los Angeles Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert #3 6-1 6-0 Stephanie Rehe #16 Match data Mar 21, 1987* QF Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert #2 6-3 6-2 Stephanie Rehe #19 Match data Feb 27, 1987* R16 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert #2 6-2 6-1 Stephanie Rehe #18 Match data Apr 12, 1986* SF Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert #2 6-1 6-0 Stephanie Rehe #19 Match data Feb 1, 1986* QF Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,610 1,228 158 88.6% 18 0 5 13 112 154
Stephanie Rehe #156 #10 60 2,005 134 98 57.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Evert Stephanie Rehe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
11 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1983 0–4 0.0% — 1,472 0 0
14 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1984 1–5 16.7% #182 1,461 0 0
15 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 4 1985 23–12 65.7% #18 1,805 0 2
16 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 11 1986 25–16 61.0% #19 1,823 0 2
17 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 15 1987 17–8 68.0% #28 1,868 0 3
18 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 27 1988 43–19 69.4% #14 1,970 0 5
19 1974 97–7 93.3% — 2,450 2 40 — — — — — — —
20 1975 85–7 92.4% #1 2,544 4 53 1990 7–6 53.8% #58 1,972 0 5
21 1976 63–5 92.6% #1 2,545 6 62 1991 5–12 29.4% #123 1,768 0 5
22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,568 7 73 1992 9–13 40.9% #74 1,746 0 5
23 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,607 8 80 1993 3–2 60.0% #156 1,759 0 5
24 1979 81–14 85.3% #2 2,440 9 87 — — — — — — —
25 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,468 11 95 — — — — — — —
26 1981 64–9 87.7% #1 2,475 12 103 — — — — — — —
27 1982 66–6 91.7% #2 2,491 14 112 — — — — — — —
28 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,400 15 118 — — — — — — —
29 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,409 16 124 — — — — — — —
30 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,428 17 133 — — — — — — —
31 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,422 18 139 — — — — — — —
32 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,334 18 144 — — — — — — —
33 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,285 18 148 — — — — — — —
34 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 148 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Evert Stephanie Rehe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1986 15 8 23 65.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
17 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1987 10 3 13 76.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0% 1988 33 14 47 70.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
19 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 40 0 40 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1975 26 2 28 92.9% 36 0 36 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1976 12 1 13 92.3% 11 0 11 100.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6% 1991 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1993 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 18 4 22 81.8% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 326 37 363 89.8% 418 26 444 94.1% 205 33 238 86.1% 279 62 341 81.8% — 89 52 141 63.1% 12 17 29 41.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 28 21 49 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Evert Stephanie Rehe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1502 97.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — — — 0.00
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1472 101.2 — — — — — +53 — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–2 — -0.11
14 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13 1984 1461 107.5 — — — — +98 — — 33.3% -1.27 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
15 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34 1985 1805 137.6 — — — — +30 — -204 66.2% +1.22 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 +1.03
16 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65 1986 1824 143.8 — — — — +5 -244 — 59.8% +0.59 9–8 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 99.5 -0.44
17 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -7.71 1987 1868 140.6 — — — — +24 -213 — 66.7% +0.83 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 107.0 -1.01
18 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.17 1988 1971 150.3 — — — — +36 -321 -361 63.4% +0.84 16–4 (80%) 9–7 (56%) 109.5 +1.45
19 1974 2450 180.5 — — — — -56 +162 -92 88.2% +3.37 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1975 2544 181.4 — — — — -55 +162 -225 89.2% +3.37 8–3 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 -5.18 1990 1972 150.4 — — — — +13 — — 48.4% -0.35 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -2.64
21 1976 2546 179.8 — — — — +44 +128 -121 86.5% +3.11 10–2 (83%) 6–4 (60%) 101.6 -3.21 1991 1768 119.9 — — — — +127 -164 -189 37.5% -0.45 1–5 (17%) 1–7 (13%) 88.2 +0.02
22 1977 2568 181.6 — — — — +148 +144 -101 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 -2.88 1992 1746 139.7 — — — — +45 — — 44.0% -0.42 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.1 -2.65
23 1978 2608 179.5 — — — — +105 +63 -131 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.79 1993 1759 118.2 — — — — +25 — — 70.0% +2.00 1–1 — — -0.09
24 1979 2440 178.4 — — — — +13 +292 +61 81.2% +2.78 12–2 (86%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 -3.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 2469 177.6 — — — — +80 +330 +100 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -4.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 2476 182.2 — — — — +9 +291 +130 86.1% +3.10 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.6 -3.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 2491 179.3 — — — — +62 +255 +73 88.2% +3.33 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 98.0 -4.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 2400 176.5 — — — — +47 +316 +178 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 2410 175.5 — — — — +69 +207 +137 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.3 -4.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2429 176.4 — — — — +30 +241 +127 85.9% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 2423 177.3 — — — — +9 +241 +113 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 2335 176.3 — — — — +23 +294 +200 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.2 -4.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 2286 173.9 — — — — +34 +319 +231 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.2 -3.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 2167 158.6 — — — — +40 +347 +265 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2610 182.0 — — — — +21 +194 -3 84.5% +2.92 164–50 (77%) 82–50 (62%) 105.8 -5.37 — 2005 148.4 — — — — +33 -192 -247 57.2% +0.47 39–35 (53%) 27–34 (44%) 96.6 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.