H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Chris Evert vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 4-0
Chris Evert holds a 4–0 lead over Susan Sloane Lundy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1989 Houston semifinal 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1989* | Houston | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Chris Evert | 7-6 6-2 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1988* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Chris Evert | 7-5 6-4 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Chris Evert | 6-1 6-0 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1986* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Chris Evert | 6-4 6-4 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | #10 | #1 | 231 | 2,574 | 1,222 | 157 | 88.6% | 18 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 115 | 146 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Evert | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 28–2 | 93.3% | — | 2,002 | 0 | 11 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 45–8 | 84.9% | — | 2,235 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1973 | 86–9 | 90.5% | — | 2,359 | 0 | 27 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 93–7 | 93.0% | — | 2,438 | 2 | 39 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1975 | 84–7 | 92.3% | — | 2,508 | 4 | 51 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 63–5 | 92.6% | — | 2,525 | 6 | 60 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1977 | 63–4 | 94.0% | — | 2,553 | 7 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 49–4 | 92.5% | — | 2,568 | 8 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 81–14 | 85.3% | — | 2,394 | 9 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 66–9 | 88.0% | — | 2,417 | 11 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 64–9 | 87.7% | — | 2,423 | 12 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 66–6 | 91.7% | — | 2,459 | 14 | 110 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 59–11 | 84.3% | — | 2,353 | 15 | 116 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 68–8 | 89.5% | #2 | 2,388 | 16 | 122 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 77–8 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,417 | 17 | 131 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 56–6 | 90.3% | #2 | 2,415 | 18 | 137 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #3 | 2,331 | 18 | 142 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,285 | 18 | 146 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #10 | 2,141 | 18 | 146 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |