H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chris Evert vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 1-0
Chris Evert holds a 1–0 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Evert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1976 Amelia Island fourth round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 83
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1976* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Chris Evert | 6-0 6-0 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | #10 | #1 | 231 | 2,574 | 1,222 | 157 | 88.6% | 18 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 115 | 146 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Evert | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1970 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1971 | 28–2 | 93.3% | — | 2,002 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1972 | 45–8 | 84.9% | — | 2,235 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 86–9 | 90.5% | — | 2,359 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 93–7 | 93.0% | — | 2,438 | 2 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1975 | 84–7 | 92.3% | — | 2,508 | 4 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1976 | 63–5 | 92.6% | — | 2,525 | 6 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1977 | 63–4 | 94.0% | — | 2,553 | 7 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1978 | 49–4 | 92.5% | — | 2,568 | 8 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1979 | 81–14 | 85.3% | — | 2,394 | 9 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1980 | 66–9 | 88.0% | — | 2,417 | 11 | 93 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 64–9 | 87.7% | — | 2,423 | 12 | 101 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 66–6 | 91.7% | — | 2,459 | 14 | 110 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1983 | 59–11 | 84.3% | — | 2,353 | 15 | 116 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1984 | 68–8 | 89.5% | #2 | 2,388 | 16 | 122 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 77–8 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,417 | 17 | 131 | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1986 | 56–6 | 90.3% | #2 | 2,415 | 18 | 137 | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1987 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #3 | 2,331 | 18 | 142 | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1988 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,285 | 18 | 146 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1989 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #10 | 2,141 | 18 | 146 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |